Set report · Switzerland · 1 Franc
Helvetia Standing 1 Franc: Who Owns What
How often each Helvetia Standing 1 Franc coin actually turns up in a collection, measured by how many of the 164 collectors of this set have one. Coins are graded from Common to Extremely scarce against the set's most-owned coin — a measure of collecting frequency, not of how many survive.
Hardest to find in real collections
The five least-owned coins of the set — ownership counts are collector-reported.
…and the ones everybody has
Full set: ownership & rarity, coin by coin
Values by grade for each of these live on the Helvetia Standing 1 Franc catalog pages and the full price guide.
| Coin | Mintage | Collectors | % of set collectors | How often collected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1875-CHNone | 1,036,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 1876-CHNone | 2,500,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1877-CHNone | 2,520,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1880-CHNone | 945,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1886-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1887-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1894-CHNone | 1,200,000 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 1896-CHNone | 28 | 2 | 1.2% | Extremely scarce |
| 1898-CHNone | 400,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1899-CHNone | 400,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1900-CHNone | 400,000 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 1901-CHNone | 400,000 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 1903-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 1904-CHNone | 400,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1905-CHNone | 700,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1906-CHNone | 700,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1907-CHNone | 800,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1908-CHNone | 1,200,000 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 1909-CHNone | 900,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1910-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1911-CHNone | 1,200,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1912-CHNone | 1,200,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1913-CHNone | 1,200,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1914-CHNone | 4,200,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1916-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 1920-CHNone | 3,300,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1921-CHNone | 3,800,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1928-CHNone | 1,500,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1931-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1932-CHNone | 500,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1934-CHNone | 500,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1936-CHNone | 500,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1937-CHNone | 1,000,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1939-CHNone | 2,106,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1940-CHNone | 2,003,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1943-CHNone | 3,526,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 1944-CHNone | 6,225,000 | 10 | 6.1% | Scarce |
| 1945-CHNone | 7,794,000 | 9 | 5.5% | Scarce |
| 1946-CHNone | 2,539,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1947-CHNone | 624,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1952-CHNone | 2,853,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1953-CHNone | 786,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1955-CHNone | 194,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 1956-CHNone | 2,500,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1957-CHNone | 6,421,000 | 10 | 6.1% | Scarce |
| 1958-CHNone | 3,580,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 1959-CHNone | 1,859,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1960-CHNone | 3,523,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 1961-CHNone | 6,549,000 | 9 | 5.5% | Scarce |
| 1962-CHNone | 6,220,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 1963-CHNone | 13,476,000 | 9 | 5.5% | Scarce |
| 1964-CHNone | 12,560,000 | 9 | 5.5% | Scarce |
| 1965-CHNone | 5,032,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1966-CHNone | 3,032,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1967-CHNone | 2,088,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1968-CHNone | 60,864,000 | 35 | 21.3% | Common |
| 1969-CHNone | 37,598,000 | 27 | 16.5% | Common |
| 1970-CHNone | 24,240,000 | 20 | 12.2% | Uncommon |
| 1971-CHNone | 11,496,000 | 16 | 9.8% | Scarce |
| 1973-CHNone | 5,000,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 1974-CHNone | 15,012,000 | 14 | 8.5% | Scarce |
| 1975-CHNone | 13,012,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 1976-CHNone | 5,009,000 | 10 | 6.1% | Scarce |
| 1976-CHNone (Proof) | — | 1 | 0.6% | Extremely scarce |
| 1977-CHNone | 6,019,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 1978-CHNone | 13,548,000 | 14 | 8.5% | Scarce |
| 1979-CHNone | 10,810,000 | 13 | 7.9% | Scarce |
| 1980-CHNone | 11,012,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 1981-CHNone | 18,023,000 | 13 | 7.9% | Scarce |
| 1982-CHNone | 15,049,000 | 13 | 7.9% | Scarce |
| 1983-CHNone | 7,029,000 | 13 | 7.9% | Scarce |
| 1983-CHNone (Proof) | — | 1 | 0.6% | Extremely scarce |
| 1984-CHNone | 3,042,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1985-CHNone | 20,054,000 | 20 | 12.2% | Uncommon |
| 1986-CHNone | 17,997,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 1987-CHNone | 17,028,000 | 10 | 6.1% | Scarce |
| 1988-CHNone | 18,029,000 | 14 | 8.5% | Scarce |
| 1989-CHNone | 15,031,000 | 16 | 9.8% | Scarce |
| 1990-CHNone | 2,032,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 1991-CHNone | 9,036,000 | 16 | 9.8% | Scarce |
| 1992-CHNone | 12,028,000 | 12 | 7.3% | Scarce |
| 1993-CHNone | 12,023,000 | 15 | 9.1% | Scarce |
| 1994-CHNone | 10,023,000 | 13 | 7.9% | Scarce |
| 1995-CHNone | 13,024,000 | 13 | 7.9% | Scarce |
| 1996-CHNone | 3,023,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1997-CHNone | 3,022,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 1998-CHNone | 3,021,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 1999-CHNone | 3,021,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 2000-CHNone | 4,026,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 2001-CHNone | 3,028,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 2002-CHNone | 1,030,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 2003-CHNone | 2,028,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 2004-CHNone | 2,029,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 2005-CHNone | 1,029,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 2006-CHNone | 2,030,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 2007-CHNone | 3,028,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 2008-CHNone | 7,026,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 2009-CHNone | 11,026,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 2010-CHNone | 15,026,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 2011-CHNone | 15,026,000 | 10 | 6.1% | Scarce |
| 2012-CHNone | 12,026,000 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 2013-CHNone | 12,023,500 | 9 | 5.5% | Scarce |
| 2014-CHNone | 13,022,000 | 10 | 6.1% | Scarce |
| 2015-CHNone | 10,026,000 | 9 | 5.5% | Scarce |
| 2016-CHNone | 10,028,000 | 11 | 6.7% | Scarce |
| 2017-CHNone | 10,029,500 | 7 | 4.3% | Very scarce |
| 2018-CHNone | 7,027,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 2019-CHNone | 9,022,000 | 6 | 3.7% | Very scarce |
| 2020-CHNone | 8,020,000 | 8 | 4.9% | Very scarce |
| 2021-CHNone | 5,021,000 | 4 | 2.4% | Very scarce |
| 2022-CHNone | 1,013,000 | 5 | 3% | Very scarce |
| 2023-CHNone | 1,020,750 | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
| 2024-CHNone | — | 3 | 1.8% | Extremely scarce |
- Common
- Uncommon
- Scarce
- Very scarce
- Extremely scarce
Based on the share of this set's collectors who own each coin — how often it turns up in a collection, not how many survive. Not the Sheldon rarity scale.
About these numbers
Ownership counts come from the same live per-coin counters shown across the LuckyCoin catalog; set-level collector counts come from the annual full-collection scan behind The State of Coin Collecting 2026. Counts are collector-reported and aggregate-only. Scarcity tiers come from 100 × (1 − owners ÷ owners of the set's most-owned coin): Common under 25, Uncommon 25–49, Scarce 50–74, Very scarce 75–89, Extremely scarce 90+. This reflects how often a coin is collected, not its surviving population — it is not the Sheldon rarity scale. CC BY 4.0 with attribution.